Lake Superior State University
Lake Superior State University
 
Related Sites

 

Alum Success

Anna Wilson

"Lake State is a local University that gave me the option to earn my education while be located close to my family.  My short-term goal is to gain as much experience as possible in the community and to possibly continue my education toward a Masters Degree.  I’d like to continue my work within the city and take advantage of opportunities to be more involved in local politics.  In the long term, after I’ve made myself as competitive as possible the marketing field, I’d like to get a job at a medium to large size company and work more with individual products or brands as opposed to marketing a company itself."

" Currently I am a Board Member on the Sault Ste. Marie Downtown Development Authority, in which my marketing background has been beneficial.  Also, I work with the International 500 Snowmobile race as the Chairperson of the Non-Race Events Committee and I work in the pits doing timing for the race and other tasks.  I am studying snowmobile mechanics to eventually become a race official or snowmobile technician.  I compete on the Soo Co-op Credit Union bowling team and I’m continually involving myself in various community events."

Anna Wilson '06
Marketing

Shared Governance

Assessment Committee

Charge - revisions approved 18 Oct 2011

  1. Define "Assessment" for  Lake Superior State University
  2. In thought and action develop a “culture of assessment” to improve academic and institutional outcomes.
  3. Incorporate the Six Fundamental Questions of the HLC into all promoted academic assessment activities
    1. How are your stated learning outcomes appropriate to your mission, programs, and degrees?
    2. What evidence do you have that students achieve your stated learning outcomes?
    3. In what ways do you analyze and use evidence of student learning?
    4. How do you ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning?
    5. How do you evaluate and improve the effectiveness of your efforts to assess and improve student learning?
    6. In what ways do you inform the public about what students learn—and how well they learn it?
  4. Develop an academic review process at the levels of course & program, department & school, college, and university which will result in the improvement of student learning including:
    1. Development of learning objectives and outcome measures which are effective, valid and reliable indicators of student achievement
    2. Systematic and scheduled planning to report assessment activities. Reporting should be in a narrative format and discuss
      1. the outcomes identified at the course and program level,  
      2. the assessment process used to provide evidence of student achievement
      3. the feedback loop describing how the assessment data is reviewed and by whom
      4. summary of changes made as a result of assessment
    3. Providing assistance and professional development opportunities to achieve the above
  5. Develop an operational support review process at the levels of unit and university which will result in the improvement of the student learning experiences, including:
    1. Development of objectives and outcomes which are effective, valid and reliable indicators of operational support services
    2. Systematic and scheduled format to report assessment activities. Reporting should be in a narrative format and discuss
      1. the outcomes identified at the unit and university level
      2. the assessment process used to provide evidence of achievement in service
      3. the feedback loop describing how the assessment data is reviewed and by whom
      4. summary of changes made as a result of assessment
    3. Providing assistance and professional development opportunities to achieve the above
  6. Assist the Provost in institutionalizing assessment
    1. Common reports formats
    2. Common storage for reports
    3. Identification of documents to be archived
    4. Development of dashboards for administrative review toward meeting goals

The original charge to the committee developed as part of the Academic Improvement Plan

i)         Review efficacy of the LSSU Strategic Plan assessment processes (includes strategic initiatives).

ii)       Ensure LSSU has incorporated the accepted HLC minimal standards for assessment including  the Higher Learning Commission’s five fundamental questions for institutions to use in discussing and defining assessment:

(1)     How are your stated student learning outcomes appropriate to your mission, programs, and degrees?

(2)     What evidence do you have that students achieve your stated learning outcomes?

(3)     In what ways do you analyze and use evidence of student learning?

(4)     How do you ensure shared responsibility for assessment of student learning?

(5)     How do you evaluate and improve the effectiveness of your efforts to assess and improve student learning?

iii)      Define “assessment” for LSSU.

iv)     Review and approve all course syllabi learning outcomes and assessment processes.

v)       Review and approve all academic program outcome statements and assessment processes.

vi)     Assist the Provost with the development of a process of regular program review.

vii)    Develop a common format for yearly academic reporting of assessment activity as defined by the HLC. This might include:

(1)     Statement of Program Outcomes by each program/degree.

(2)     A discussion of the assessment processes used to generate data appropriate for analysis of student success in achievement of outcomes. What measures are used?  Direct?  Indirect?  Etc.

(3)     An overview of the feedback loop, describing how the assessment data is reviewed and by whom.  What measures are in place to insure that faculty read and react or respond to the results of assessment data.

(4)     A one year summary of changes in course content, syllabi, or course requirements, etc. driven by an analysis of the assessment data. 

viii)  Review and evaluate the use of assessment by institutional units and recommend improvements in their assessment processes where necessary.

ix)     Review and evaluate the effectiveness of the institution’s responses to assessment and evaluation in the form of budgetary or programmatic modifications.

x)       Review and evaluate the use of specific performance standards by individual units for purposes of continual improvement of programs and/or services.

xi)     Assist the Provost in institutionalizing assessment.

(1)     Common reports formats.

(2)     Common storage for reports.

(3)     Identification of documents to be archived.

(4)     Development of dashboards for administrative review towards meeting goals.

Majoring in Sociology...

Carrie McBride

Carrie McBride
Sociology
Caro, MI

I love the small tight-knit community on campus.You always see someone you know while walking to class.Your professors know you on a first name basis. [ more ]

Apply Today!

Home » Charge
Share this page with your friends: